Reviewing my channel

Okay after looking at a couple of your videos I would say there is one big thing you to work on which is your Audio. Your coming in very soft at times even wearing headphones like I do and having youtube cranked to max your soft. I would say you should invest in a Mic that may help, Also I would say avoid filming in your car unless you got a really nice camera that can pick up everything your saying cause that was when you were the softest.

As someone who does review of video games I think the biggest thing is you need to show a little more energy when doing the reviews on camera. It seems like your just reading from a script and nothing else. You want to give out your reasons why you loved this movie or why you think this movie was crap on a stick. If you get excited about something than your subs will do the same. I think right now what is holding you back right now is your audio issues, I think if you get that corrected it will help get people to watch more. And also promote the crap out of your videos when they come out. On here, Google+ Places like you want everyone to see what your doing and people will check it out. Especially if it is a new movie that they are curious about cause people like hearing from different sources before they want to go and waste the money on a movie.

Intro is good nice a bright, little loud, but very nice work and I would say you should call yourself you channel name instead of you regular name. It makes people associate your channel to that name the more you use it. Its why guys like Markiplier always use his when he does his intros, its your brand and you want to promote it.

Beyond that good luck in your future endeavors.
 
IronAntz said:
Okay after looking at a couple of your videos I would say there is one big thing you to work on which is your Audio. Your coming in very soft at times even wearing headphones like I do and having youtube cranked to max your soft. I would say you should invest in a Mic that may help, Also I would say avoid filming in your car unless you got a really nice camera that can pick up everything your saying cause that was when you were the softest.

As someone who does review of video games I think the biggest thing is you need to show a little more energy when doing the reviews on camera. It seems like your just reading from a script and nothing else. You want to give out your reasons why you loved this movie or why you think this movie was crap on a stick. If you get excited about something than your subs will do the same. I think right now what is holding you back right now is your audio issues, I think if you get that corrected it will help get people to watch more. And also promote the crap out of your videos when they come out. On here, Google+ Places like you want everyone to see what your doing and people will check it out. Especially if it is a new movie that they are curious about cause people like hearing from different sources before they want to go and waste the money on a movie.

Intro is good nice a bright, little loud, but very nice work and I would say you should call yourself you channel name instead of you regular name. It makes people associate your channel to that name the more you use it. Its why guys like Markiplier always use his when he does his intros, its your brand and you want to promote it.

Beyond that good luck in your future endeavors.
Click to expand...

Ok so what you're saying is that me trying to give a neutral review isn't the route to go? I just need to focus all of my energy on my presentation? I am kinda low energy on purpose since It bugs me when people give movie reviews and insist it's good even though it really isn't. And better audio which is fixable of course. So assuming I fix those major issues and the minor ones, then you think the subscribers and views will come because I've been stuck at 20 subscribers for about a month now, but still been getting some views. Anyway, thank you so much!

Thank you so much!
 
Last edited:
Its more you wanna give more of a balance review. You don't want to go totally negative all the time cause then people will think your standards are to high. And you don't want to give high praise to a movie that sucks. Its more you wanna give a bit of the good and a bit of the bad and then tell the people based on you being a movie goer if you think the movie is worth it no matter how many bad things about.

Example Batman V Superman, on its own for a movie it was a good movie that I think people should go see and that they would enjoy just because of the story and the visuals. For a comic book fan like myself I felt the characters were far far to stiff. They were two serious and the film seemed to be missing something. But I loved Ben Afflieck as Batman and Henry Cavill is still a great superman, it was more the story felt to stiff for a what it could have been. That and the character they had as Lex Luthor was not Lex it was some strange whinny character.

Something like that give your audience the idea of what the movie is and how it is without giving out spoilers. People want to know if a movie is worth their time and money or if they should just wait and see. And many people may disagree with you but still you are giving an opinion that will help them form their own and that is what our jobs are as reviewers. To give them the information about what we saw and our thoughts about them.
 
IronAntz said:
Its more you wanna give more of a balance review. You don't want to go totally negative all the time cause then people will think your standards are to high. And you don't want to give high praise to a movie that sucks. Its more you wanna give a bit of the good and a bit of the bad and then tell the people based on you being a movie goer if you think the movie is worth it no matter how many bad things about.

Example Batman V Superman, on its own for a movie it was a good movie that I think people should go see and that they would enjoy just because of the story and the visuals. For a comic book fan like myself I felt the characters were far far to stiff. They were two serious and the film seemed to be missing something. But I loved Ben Afflieck as Batman and Henry Cavill is still a great superman, it was more the story felt to stiff for a what it could have been. That and the character they had as Lex Luthor was not Lex it was some strange whinny character.

Something like that give your audience the idea of what the movie is and how it is without giving out spoilers. People want to know if a movie is worth their time and money or if they should just wait and see. And many people may disagree with you but still you are giving an opinion that will help them form their own and that is what our jobs are as reviewers. To give them the information about what we saw and our thoughts about them.
Click to expand...


That Sounds like exactly what I do on my channel. I say what i like about it and why, what I don't like about it and why, and then I give it a grade.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top