Steve0192
I've Got It
On thing I've noticed over the time is the difference behaviour I see when I actively promote a video vs when I just let it develop itself (with all the usual SEO, Keywords etc.).
By "Active Promotion" I mean posting on relevant forums, Reddit, Google Plus etc. When I do that, I get a spike of interest on that post for a day or so, maybe get 200-300 views and a few new subscribers, but the volume of views drop off very quickly back to the usual background level. Also when I look at Audience Retention, I see about a 50% drop off rate over the first few seconds. I guess because people who are not really interested have a quick look and then move away.
By "Organic Growth" I mean I create the video, add a description and keywords etc. but then let it evolve itself. In this case the initial video growth is slower but it comes primarily from Subscribers, YouTube Search, and Suggested Videos. The take up of the video is much slower, without the same spike, but the Audience Retention is much better and sustained across the duration of the video.
Recently I've been thinking that while I get that initial spike of interest with Active Promotion, it may be hurting the longer term performance of the video. Whereas if I let it grow organically I don't get that initial spike but I do get more of a longer tail of views, especially from Search.
Has anyone else noticed this?
Steve
By "Active Promotion" I mean posting on relevant forums, Reddit, Google Plus etc. When I do that, I get a spike of interest on that post for a day or so, maybe get 200-300 views and a few new subscribers, but the volume of views drop off very quickly back to the usual background level. Also when I look at Audience Retention, I see about a 50% drop off rate over the first few seconds. I guess because people who are not really interested have a quick look and then move away.
By "Organic Growth" I mean I create the video, add a description and keywords etc. but then let it evolve itself. In this case the initial video growth is slower but it comes primarily from Subscribers, YouTube Search, and Suggested Videos. The take up of the video is much slower, without the same spike, but the Audience Retention is much better and sustained across the duration of the video.
Recently I've been thinking that while I get that initial spike of interest with Active Promotion, it may be hurting the longer term performance of the video. Whereas if I let it grow organically I don't get that initial spike but I do get more of a longer tail of views, especially from Search.
Has anyone else noticed this?
Steve