Privacy report strike?

[BookOfKen]

Alright I have a question. If I have a video on YouTube that has a persons audio but their face is facing away from the camera (so you cannot know who it is) will I win the YouTube review? Can just audio be used in a privacy complaint? Because on the google guidelines it says that your voice need to be unique, so someone famous I presume that someone could spot out just by hearing you.

Please give me some tips when you see this it's much appreciative

 

[Crown]

I'll move this to the legal issues forum

 

[BookOfKen]

thanks crown! Yea anyone who has any info on this, it would be much helpful. If you want to see an example of the complaint, check out the pizza prank video and the guy who's talking to the old lady is the guy who filed the complaint. He's once again facing away from the camera, and you can hear his voice.

 

[Gabriel]

How does YouTube determine if content should be removed for a privacy violation?
For content to be considered for removal, an individual must be uniquely identifiable by image, voice, full name, National Insurance number, bank account number or contact information (e.g. home address, email address). Examples that would not violate our privacy guidelines include gamer tags, avatar names and address information in which the individual is not named. We also take public interest, newsworthiness and consent into account when determining if content should be removed for a privacy violation. YouTube reserves the right to make the final determination of whether a violation of its privacy guidelines has occurred.

 

[BookOfKen]

How does YouTube determine if content should be removed for a privacy violation?
For content to be considered for removal, an individual must be uniquely identifiable by image, voice, full name, National Insurance number, bank account number or contact information (e.g. home address, email address). Examples that would not violate our privacy guidelines include gamer tags, avatar names and address information in which the individual is not named. We also take public interest, newsworthiness and consent into account when determining if content should be removed for a privacy violation. YouTube reserves the right to make the final determination of whether a violation of its privacy guidelines has occurred.

"uniquely identifiable"
Would that mean that voice is not considered unique if he's not famous. A face is unique, its obvious its you if you see your face, but not audio if your not famous.? That what I would think at least.

 

[Gabriel]

"uniquely identifiable"
Would that mean that voice is not considered unique if he's not famous. A face is unique, its obvious its you if you see your face, but not audio if your not famous.? That what I would think at least.

Anyone can file a privacy complaint so no if he's not famous that doesn't discredit his complaint. Everyone's voice is unique, whereas a robot voice wouldn't surface as unique and you wouldn't be able to file for that.